What type of reporting should Managers focus on for vulnerability workload?

Managers should focus on aggregated data for priority and workload when assessing vulnerability work. This approach allows them to see an overview of the vulnerabilities that need to be addressed, and helps in prioritizing actions based on factors such as the severity of vulnerabilities, the potential impact on the organization, and available resources.

Aggregated data provides a comprehensive view of trends and patterns within the organization's vulnerabilities, making it easier to identify where to allocate resources most effectively. By focusing on workload as a whole rather than individual cases, managers can streamline processes, ensure more efficient use of manpower, and ultimately improve response times to vulnerabilities that pose the highest risk.

In contrast, while case studies and individual reports may offer deep insights into specific instances of vulnerability, they do not present a holistic picture of overall workload or priorities. Likewise, comprehensive vulnerability responses may be important to review but do not directly inform managers on the broader context of how many vulnerabilities are present or the workload associated with them. User feedback and satisfaction reports may provide valuable insight into experiences and perceptions but do not offer the data needed for effective prioritization and resource allocation in vulnerability management.